What makes you sing? What makes
you jive? What makes you go around the world? What makes you click a
photograph? And the possibilities are endless.
Thinking of these possibilities,
I came up with a question as to what makes a person act or react. I surmised
that a person, place, thing or situation doesn’t always garner a reaction from
all. And when it does, the reactions can be extensively and intensively
different. An example would illustrate my point better. When a group of people
listen to a song at the same time, the first instantly thinks about its raag, taal and pitch, the second delves
into its rhyme and lyrics, the third begins to choreograph it in his mind and
the fourth predicts its commercial appeal while the fifth only wonders what to
cook for dinner tonight. Isn’t it
fascinating how our mind evolves in different dimensions and the same thing
impresses different people so distinctly?
It is this variety in thought that
makes life so interesting. A recent treasure hunt that I participated in
accentuated this fact most humorously and concretely. The organizers couldn’t
have ever imagined that their clues could have so many possible interpretations
as the participants came out with. For
example, one of the clues to be solved in a particular area just mentioned
“Father on the board”, now with that hint we had to actually find the signage “Appa Garden Street” (appa means father
in the local language) which is put at the corner of the road but
coincidentally there is a church in the same vicinity and some of our friends
went around the church looking for a message of the ‘Father’ as in “Jesus” put
up on some board. And others went further to find the ‘Father’ inside the church
in the form of a ‘priest’. Isn’t it hilarious and contemplative at the same time?
There were several such stories of my treasure hunt with the most imaginative
interpretation of every clue. I am sure the organizers never thought that their
clues would be source of such reflective fun.
Another thing that I found quite
interesting about that day was that none of the interpretations were literally
right or wrong, they were simply different. The organizers thought in one way
while the participants thought in quite the other. Of course the interpretation
as meant by the organizers would have helped to decipher the clue and win the
treasure but we can’t judge the “interpretations” per se.
The same holds true between
individuals, families and societies. We are all entitled to our own
interpretation but asserting it as the verdict creates conflicts and rifts.
Each thinks himself to be right and the other as follied, but in truth we are
just different. To think differently is the beauty of the mind but to react
differently is the test of the mind.
We live in a world of differences
– pun intended, where Salman Rushdie’s book is acclaimed by one society but he
is issued a fatwa for the same book by another society; where music is
considered a path to God by one community yet it is labeled blasphemous by
another; where Agent Vinod might run a marathon at the box office in one
country but it is already banned in another.
You see, we have the right to our
thoughts, but do we also have the right to wrong others’?